Checkmark
Legislation watch
     

Search all years.

2012 Senate Bill 6010: Concerning worker safety at state hospitals
Introduced by Sen. Mike Carrell (Lakewood) (R) on January 9, 2012
Authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) to seek an expert mental evaluation of any patient in its custody when that patient has allegedly assaulted a hospital employee. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine competency to stand trial for the assault. DSHS must forward the evaluation results to the proper prosecuting authorities to make a charging determination.   Official Text and Analysis.
Referred to the Senate Human Services & Corrections Committee on January 9, 2012
Substitute offered in the Senate on February 3, 2012
Removes provisions requiring the Department of Social and Health Services to conduct a competency evaluation for a patient who has assaulted a state hospital employee and requiring a patient's county of origin to pay costs of incarceration for a patient arrested for a crime committed at a state hospital.
The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on February 3, 2012
Referred to the Senate Rules Committee on February 11, 2012
Amendment offered by Sen. Jim Honeyford (Grandview) (R) on February 13, 2012
Allows a state hospital to administer antipsychotic medication to a person who has been committed as criminally insane under the same procedures applicable to a civilly committed patient. A court may not authorize administration of the medication beyond 180 days.
The amendment passed by voice vote in the Senate on February 13, 2012
Expands the crime of custodial assault to include an assault on a full or part-time staff member or volunteer, any educational personnel, any personal service provider, or any vendor or agent of a state hospital who was performing official duties at the time of the assault. A jail may not refuse to book a patient of a state hospital based solely on the patient's status as a state hospital patient, but may consider other relevant factors which apply to the individual circumstances of the case. A state hospital may administer antipsychotic medication without consent to a person committed as criminally insane. The maximum period during which the court may authorize medication is 180 days or the time remaining in the person's order of commitment, whichever is shorter. The state has a compelling interest in providing antipsychotic medication to a patient who has been committed as criminally insane when refusal of antipsychotic medication would result in a likelihood of serious harm or substantial deterioration or substantially prolong the length of involuntary commitment and there is no less intrusive course of treatment than medication in the best interest of the patient.
Received in the House on February 15, 2012
Referred to the House Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness Committee on February 15, 2012