Checkmark
Legislation watch
     

Search all years.

2011 Senate Bill 5077: Prohibiting the use of eminent domain for economic development
Introduced by Sen. Cheryl Pflug, (R-Maple Valley) (R) on January 13, 2011
To provide that private property may be taken only for public use and the taking of private property by any public entity for economic development does not constitute a public use. No public entity may take property for the purpose of economic development.   Official Text and Analysis.
Referred to the Senate Government Operations, Tribal Relations & Elections Committee on January 13, 2011
Substitute offered in the Senate on February 7, 2011
To change the term public utility to public service company and clarify that in an action to establish or challenge the public use of a condemnation, the taking is deemed to be for economic development if the court determines that the condemnation does not result in any of the stipulated exceptions, including any activity to increase tax revenue, tax base, employment, or general economic health.
The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on February 7, 2011
Referred to the Senate Rules Committee on February 8, 2011
Amendment offered by Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, (D-Camano Island) (D) on March 7, 2011
To exempt highway projects from the definition of "economic development".
The amendment passed by voice vote in the Senate on March 7, 2011
Amendment offered by Sen. Craig Pridemore, (D-Vancouver) (D) on March 7, 2011
To change "publicly owned utility" to "consumer-owned utility" and adds definitions for "public service company" and "consumer-owned utility".
The amendment passed by voice vote in the Senate on March 7, 2011
Provides that private property may be taken only for public use and the taking of private property by any public entity, including publicly-owned utilities, for economic development does not constitute a public use. An action to establish or challenge the public use of a condemnation, the taking is deemed to be for economic development if the court determines that the condemnation does not result in any of the stipulated exceptions, including any activity to increase tax revenue, tax base, employment, or general economic health. Highway projects are exempt.
Received in the House on March 9, 2011
Referred to the House Judiciary Committee on March 9, 2011
Received in the Senate on December 7, 2011
Referred to the Senate Government Operations, Tribal Relations & Elections Committee on December 7, 2011