To require consideration of whether the applicant has a good record of providing information to those applying for development permits. The bill also adds to the duties of the Office of Regulatory Assistance; to provide information about best practices and providing technical assistance in reducing the turnaround time between submittal of a permit and issuance.   Official Text and Analysis.

To strike the original bill. The new bill defines the information that should be included to clarify what a permit applicant is required to provide. The amendment also add expiration dates.

To recommend the elimination of the following biennial reporting requirements of the ORA: a report on the agency's performance based on customer surveys; a report on any statutory or regulatory conflicts identified by the office in the course of its duties; and a report on its use of outside independent consultants. The Appropriations Committee also recommended the elimination of the appropriation contained in the bill.

To require that local governments may show that they have both developed and adhered to guidelines regarding its permitting process for preferential status when applying to the PWB and CERB.

To remove the language regarding the CERB, PWB, or JDF applicant's "good record" from the criteria used when making funding decisions and replaces with language regarding whether the applicant has developed guidelines and information regarding its permitting process. Removes the section of the bill regarding LIFT.

To remove the appropriation.