Checkmark
Legislation watch
     

Search all years.

2013 House Bill 1395: Implementing the unemployment insurance integrity provisions of the federal trade adjustment assistance extension act of 2011
Introduced by Rep. Mike Sells (Everett) (D) on January 25, 2013
Switches some funds from the administrative contingency fund to the unemployment compensation fund. This act alters provides that an individual who is disqualified for unemployment benefits for the first time is subject to an additional penalty. This act reforms employers’ reporting requirements relating to unemployment benefits. This act takes effect on October 20, 2013. (See also SB 5355).   Official Text and Analysis.
Referred to the House Labor & Workforce Development Committee on January 25, 2013
Referred to the House Rules Committee on February 7, 2013
Amendment offered by Rep. Mike Sells (Everett) (D) on March 9, 2013
Deletes the requirement that a pattern of failures to respond to information requests without good cause is necessary to prohibit relief of benefit charges or credit of benefit payments.
The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on March 9, 2013
Subjects individuals who commit unemployment claimant fraud for the first time to an additional penalty of 15 percent of benefits overpaid. Prohibits relief from benefit charges and credit for benefit payments when benefits were paid because an employer failed to respond timely or adequately to the Employment Security Department's information requests without good cause.
Received in the Senate on March 12, 2013
Referred to the Senate Commerce & Labor Committee on March 12, 2013
Amendment offered in the Senate on April 3, 2013
Requires a pattern of failures to respond to information requests without good cause before benefit charge relief will be withheld from the employer. A pattern is three occurrences in the previous two years or on at least 20 percent of the current claims against the employer. The amendment also provides that when determining whether to grant an overpayment waiver, ESD must consider whether the employer or their agent failed to respond timely or adequately to a written request for information without good cause.
Referred to the Senate Rules Committee on April 3, 2013