Washington Votes Forum

This legislation is a fondling advance toward the ultimate violation of our individual liberty and opens a serious moral / ethical question (if ethics is still of any actual concern to anyone in office anymore??). What is our body, if not our most primary of personal property over which our individual...

Sorta brings to mind a scene from Monty Python's meaning of life where the state breaks into a family dinner to grab a man's organ he signed a donor sheet for. I wonder when the dems are going to authorize the organ police.

It should concern legislators voting on this bill that this bill has substantial Constitutional problems. Specifically, the Supreme Court ruling of Troxel v. Granville ( http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-138.ZS.html ), which opens with the following statement: "Justice O’Connor, joined...

In my understanding of a Constitution, each clause represents a law, which once established is a truth. Much like a Law of Nature, it cannot be false, nor can an amendment be contrary to it. If an amendment were to conflict with an already established truth, then it is Unconstitutional, and becomes Null...

I have a few concerns regarding the Federal Establishment. 1. The U.S. Constitution contains a clause that restricts amending specific clauses prior to the year 1808. Could congress propose an amendment stating that the clauses can be changed at anytime before, during, and after 1808? It would seem that...