Lainie59, I take it that in order for you to be consistent in your views (and not hypocritical) you are also against those corporate "thugs" who spend millions of dollars for lobbyists in Washington, D.C. notwithstanding what shareholders want those corporate "thugs" to do with their money? I also take it that you are strongly opposed to the Citizens United case which opened the door for corporations, billionaires and millionaires (you know, the rich "thugs" like the Koch brothers) to spend unlimited amounts to buy elections?
Why is it that I think you are probably okay with these rich corporate type of "thugs" buying elections, but opposed to any other organizations that may spend much lesser amounts to try to level the playing field? So revealing.