Washington Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Evergreen State.
Welcome to Washington Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 02-03-2009 4:43 PM by principles. 4 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    • admin
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-19-2008

    2009 House Bill 1350 (Concerning the election of President of the United States)

    Introduced in the House on January 19, 2009

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 01-19-2009 7:25 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 1350 (Concerning the election of President of the United States)

     Excuse me, but doesn't the Constitution specify the election procedure for choosing the President?  You can't just circumvent it like this!  You swore to uphold the Constitution, and you should be turned out of office if you fail to fulfill this part of your job description.  There's a little thing called the amendment process that you can use if there is sufficient agreement. 

  • 01-19-2009 10:56 PM In reply to

    • Tritium
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 11-23-2008
    • Seattle, WA

    Re: 2009 House Bill 1350 (Concerning the election of President of the United States)

     I find it awfully concerning how the State Legislature is following a similar method used by the Federal legislature to circumvent our foundation, which has been weakened more than people care to believe.  I'd like to point out that there is a terrible trend being set across the country.  First, elections shouldn't be as close as they have been.  There should be a difinitive winner everytime. The further we go, it seems the more that is chipped away at Liberty and Justice, as well as any possibility for people to pursue happiness. Secondly, One of the great principles laid down in the Federal Constitution was that each house in congress, and each of the other two branches would be appointed from different sources.  We've seen the terrible suffering such a change has caused by removing the state legislature from appointing senators.  More democratic, perhaps, but democracies have failed due to improper allegiances that are loyal to anyone but those who elected them.  Washington & Madison warned us of the ensuing imperial wars that would follow before a century could pass, and hoped any deviation would prove Unconstitutional, else this country would not last.

    For further reference, consider reading Washington's farewell address, and another well known document, "Declaration of Independence."

     

    Idea-Tritium

  • 01-22-2009 6:55 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 1350 (Concerning the election of President of the United States)

    Tritium - why can't elections be a close call - whether federal, state or local? Just asking.

     

    As for this bill, I would have to re-review the need for such a change, and what the costs and benefits really are. I personally believe that if the Electoral and Popular vote differ, the Popular should always prevail.

    Filed under: ,
  • 02-03-2009 4:43 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 1350 (Concerning the election of President of the United States)

    Doesn't the federal Constitution trump this proposal?  This nation is a republic, not a democracy, for the purpose of protecting states' rights.  This proposes to eliminate the united voice of our state.

Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems