Washington Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Evergreen State.
Welcome to Washington Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 12-03-2008 7:17 PM by Care Medical. 2 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    • admin
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-19-2008

    2007 House Bill 1324 (Providing sales and use tax exemptions for prescribed durable medical equipment used in the home and prescribed mobility enhancing equipment.)

    Introduced in the House on January 17, 2007

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 01-18-2007 3:10 PM In reply to

    HB 1324

    "The bill requires the seller to collect the tax but the buyer may petition the State for reimbursement." This makes no sense. It seems to me it would cost the state more to process the refund requests than the lost sales taxes.
  • 12-03-2008 7:17 PM In reply to

    Re: 2007 House Bill 1324 (Providing sales and use tax exemptions for prescribed durable medical equipment used in the home and prescribed mobility enhancing equipment.)

     

    Dear Anonymous,

     

    One of the primary intentions is to clarify some of the existing complexities in sales tax for Durable Medical Equipment (DME).  Even something as simple as a CPAP is terribly complex for both patients and providers.  Using CPAP as an example, are usually considered DME which then it is subject to sales tax, but if the machine (not just the mask) is worn on the patient’s body it qualifies as a “prosthetic” and is exempt from sales tax.  Det. No. 07-0150, 27 WTD 114 (2008).

     

    Washington Department of Revenue (DOR) has ruled that sales tax is the payor’s responsibility.  In many instances where the insurance provider does not recognize reimbursement of sales tax as a covered benefit, the tax responsibility ultimately falls on the insured patients themselves.  This is an incredible burden for the patient during the very time in which they need assistance.  Another thought worth mentioning is that DSHS pays sales tax for its Medicaid beneficiaries.  The amount of loss for patients, families, providers, and the State of Washington are absolutely staggering.

     

    Passage of such legislation would significantly assist Washington’s citizens access to more cost effective healthcare services, and would greatly reduce secondary costs associated with emergency and institutionalized care, which the State of Washington and insurance companies must then absorb.  It is an utter shame that these bills have not been passed as the additional ~8.6% costs associated with sales tax places great burden on our veterans, disabled, elderly, and indigent populations. 

     

Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems