<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>WashingtonVotes : legislature, taxpayers, budget</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/taxpayers/budget/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: legislature, taxpayers, budget</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Legislature considers bill to suspend 2/3 tax requirement</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/04/legislature-considers-bill-to-suspend-2-3-tax-requirement.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121675</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121675</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/04/legislature-considers-bill-to-suspend-2-3-tax-requirement.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;SB 6843, which would eliminate the 2/3 vote requirement&amp;nbsp;to increase&amp;nbsp;taxes, was introduced today in the Senate.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In addition to removing the 2/3&amp;nbsp;requirement,&amp;nbsp;SB 6843 would also eleminate the requirement for the state to provide&amp;nbsp;the 10 year fiscal impact statement and other provisions adopted through&amp;nbsp;I-960, as approved by statewide voters.&amp;nbsp; Is this a good idea?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121675" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx">elections</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxpayers/default.aspx">taxpayers</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category></item><item><title>Bill of the Day: HB 2872 - allowing time to review the budget</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/01/25/bill-of-the-day-hb-2872-allowing-time-to-review-the-budget.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121522</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121522</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/01/25/bill-of-the-day-hb-2872-allowing-time-to-review-the-budget.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Today&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;Bill of the Day is &lt;a href="http://washingtonvotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=105084" class="null"&gt;HB 2872&lt;/a&gt;, which would require the Legislature to take a 72-hour timeout before voting on the state&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;operating, capital and transportation budgets.&amp;nbsp; The bill, sponsored by &lt;a href="http://washingtonvotes.org/Legislator.aspx?ID=912" class="null"&gt;Rep. Alexander&lt;/a&gt;, is being heard by the House Ways &amp;amp; Means Committee today at 3:30 PM.&amp;nbsp; Here is a good op-ed&amp;nbsp;in today&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;Olympian&lt;/em&gt; explaining&amp;nbsp;how this bill would provide additional sunshine&amp;nbsp;on the budget process in our state: &lt;a href="http://www.theolympian.com/opinion/story/1113934.html" class="null"&gt;Public deserves 72 hours to see how money is spent.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121522" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/government/default.aspx">government</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/citizens/default.aspx">citizens</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxpayers/default.aspx">taxpayers</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category></item></channel></rss>