<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>WashingtonVotes</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Transparency Games Continue</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/18/transparency-games-continue.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:122005</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=122005</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/18/transparency-games-continue.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;WashingtonVotes.org provides plain-English&amp;nbsp;descriptions of every bill and amendment offered in the state Legislature.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;goal of providing this&amp;nbsp;resource to citizens, however,&amp;nbsp;has&amp;nbsp;been made difficult&amp;nbsp;this year due to the lack of legislative transparency.&amp;nbsp; Here is an op-ed we wrote highlighting these difficulties:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/controlpanel/blogs/posteditor.aspx/" title="http://www.washingtonpolicy.org/Centers/government/opinioneditorials/GhostBills.html" class="null"&gt;Ghost Bills and Mystery Hearings Mark 2010 Session, Creating Lack of Public Process&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite public outcry&amp;nbsp;over&amp;nbsp;the lack of transparency in the legislative process, the games continue.&amp;nbsp; Today the Senate Ways and Means Committee held a public hearing with less than &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/controlpanel/blogs/posteditor.aspx/" title="http://washingtonpolicyblog.typepad.com/washington_policy_center_/2010/03/senate-hearing-scheduled-agenda-tbd.html" class="null"&gt;24 hours of notice&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; During the public hearing lawmakers considered a&amp;nbsp;draft to SB 6889 (It was noted on the agenda as S-5541.1).&amp;nbsp; So what&amp;#39;s the big deal?&amp;nbsp; SB 6889 was not even officially introduced by the Senate at&amp;nbsp;the time of the public hearing,&amp;nbsp;though I&amp;nbsp;suspect that it will be on&amp;nbsp;tomorrow&amp;#39;s introduction sheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;nbsp;will be interesting to see how the bill history will read for SB 6889.&amp;nbsp; Will they acknowledge that the public hearing was held before the bill was introduced?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=122005" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/transparency/default.aspx">transparency</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/public+process/default.aspx">public process</category></item><item><title>First act of Special Session: Waive rules</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/16/first-act-of-special-session-waive-rules.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121999</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121999</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/16/first-act-of-special-session-waive-rules.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The first action&amp;nbsp;of the&amp;nbsp;Special Session, which begins today in Olympia, was a vote by the Senate to&amp;nbsp;modify&amp;nbsp;transparency rules.&amp;nbsp; The rule change by the Senate&amp;nbsp;would allow for immediate floor action&amp;nbsp;on bills&amp;nbsp;after they pass a committee.&amp;nbsp; Here is a good blog&amp;nbsp;post describing today&amp;#39;s action: &lt;a href="http://washingtonpolicyblog.typepad.com/washington_policy_center_/2010/03/senate-adopts-rule-change-to-speed-up-session-.html" class="null"&gt;Senate adopts rule change to speed up votes&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121999" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx">special session</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/votes/default.aspx">votes</category></item><item><title>Special Session begins today</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/15/special-session-begins-today.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121998</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121998</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/15/special-session-begins-today.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Special Session begins today in Olympia. There are very few details available, but lawmakers are expected to continue the work they started during the regular 60-day session. Their unfinished work includes negotiating the supplemental budget and finalizing a tax package. Check back later for more details as they become available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121998" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx">special session</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes.+budget/default.aspx">taxes. budget</category></item><item><title>Its not over, Legislature headed for overtime!</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/12/its-not-over-legislature-headed-for-overtime.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121989</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121989</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/12/its-not-over-legislature-headed-for-overtime.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Special Session will begin on Monday, March 15, 2010.&amp;nbsp; Legislators failed to finish their work in the provided 60-day session and will use the additional time to pass a budget and increase taxes.&amp;nbsp; What are your thoughts on this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121989" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx">special session</category></item><item><title>Special Session becoming reality</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/10/special-session-becoming-reality.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121968</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121968</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/10/special-session-becoming-reality.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;em&gt;Seattle Times&lt;/em&gt; is reporting this morning that&amp;nbsp;lawmakers in Olympia have determined that a special session&amp;nbsp;will be needed to finish the supplemental budget and tax packages.&amp;nbsp; Do you&amp;nbsp;think that lawmakers should have more time?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121968" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx">special session</category></item><item><title>Senate to hear income tax bill in public hearing this afternoon.</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/senate-to-hear-income-tax-bill-in-public-hearing-this-afternoon.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121920</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121920</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/senate-to-hear-income-tax-bill-in-public-hearing-this-afternoon.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The state income tax bill scheduled for public hearing today at 4:30. SB 6250, which would create a graduated income tax, has been scheduled for a public hearing in the Senate Ways &amp;amp; Means Committee today at 4:30. It is our understanding the an amendment will be offered, but it is not yet available to the public. Stay tuned!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121920" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/citizens/default.aspx">citizens</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/voters/default.aspx">voters</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/income+tax/default.aspx">income tax</category></item><item><title>Auto theft surcharge to cost $9.6 million per year</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/auto-theft-surcharge-to-cost-9-6-million-per-year.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121917</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121917</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/auto-theft-surcharge-to-cost-9-6-million-per-year.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Senate Ways and Means Committee&amp;nbsp;passes SB 6871. Along with increasing court filing fees the proposal would also add a surcharge to car insurance policies to fight auto theft. According to the I-960 fiscal impact statement, the new charge is expected to collect $9.6 million annually from auto policyholders. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121917" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/fees/default.aspx">fees</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/insurance/default.aspx">insurance</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/theft/default.aspx">theft</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/auto/default.aspx">auto</category></item><item><title>Governor signs I-960 bill without vetoing advisory vote repeal </title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/25/governor-signs-i-960-bill-without-vetoing-advisory-vote-repeal.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121879</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121879</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/25/governor-signs-i-960-bill-without-vetoing-advisory-vote-repeal.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Governor Gregoire signed &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://washingtonpolicyblog.typepad.com/washington_policy_center_/2010/02/will-governor-veto-tax-transparency-suspension-.html"&gt;SB 6130 as adopted by the Legislature&lt;/a&gt;. There was some question as to whether the Governor would veto the 2-year repeal of the non-binding advisory votes. She said that she delayed the bill signing today to consider the requests to veto that section of the bill. As a result of today&amp;#39;s action the Washington Policy Center will be &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpolicy.org/pressroom/pressreleases/WPCPublishI960Pamphlet.html"&gt;publishing an I-960 voter&amp;#39;s pamphlet&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121879" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/government/default.aspx">government</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/governor/default.aspx">governor</category></item><item><title>Senate and House release budgets</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/24/senate-and-house-release-budgets.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121877</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121877</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/24/senate-and-house-release-budgets.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, both the Senate and House of Representatives released their&amp;nbsp;2010 supplemental budget proposals.&amp;nbsp; Each budget relies on both tax cuts and reduced spending.&amp;nbsp; To see the details for each bill check out SB 6444 and HB 2824.&amp;nbsp; As more details regarding these budget proposals become available we will post them here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121877" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category></item><item><title>WashingtonVotes.org to provide information for I-960 voters' pamphlet</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/19/washingtonvotes-org-to-provide-information-for-i-960-voters-pamphlet.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121859</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121859</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/19/washingtonvotes-org-to-provide-information-for-i-960-voters-pamphlet.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;In the wake of SB 6130, which&amp;nbsp;would&amp;nbsp;repeal&amp;nbsp;voter protections in Initiative 960, Washington Policy Center today announced it will publish the public disclosure information that would have appeared in the voters&amp;rsquo; pamphlet if Initiative 960 had remained in place.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpolicy.org/pressroom/pressreleases/WPCPublishI960Pamphlet.html" class="null"&gt; Click here to read the full release from the Washignton Policy Center&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121859" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx">elections</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/voters/default.aspx">voters</category></item><item><title>House debating SB 6130 on floor</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-debating-sb-6130-on-floor.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121829</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121829</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-debating-sb-6130-on-floor.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The House of Representatives is&amp;nbsp;debating SB 6130 on the floor of the House.&amp;nbsp; SB 6130 would repeal voter protections of I-960 including eliminating&amp;nbsp;the 2/3 requiremnet to raise taxes and the requirement to provide&amp;nbsp;non-binding vote by the public when the legislature increases taxes.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121829" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/citizens/default.aspx">citizens</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/initiative/default.aspx">initiative</category></item><item><title>House of Origin cutoff for both chambers</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-of-origin-cutoff-for-both-chambers.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121824</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121824</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-of-origin-cutoff-for-both-chambers.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Both the Senate and the House are working towards today&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;House of Origin cutoff at 5:00 PM this afternoon.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Did the legislation that you are tracking pass?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121824" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category></item><item><title>Budget deficit grows to $2.8 billion</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/budget-deficit-grows-to-2-8-billion.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121795</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121795</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/budget-deficit-grows-to-2-8-billion.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The state&amp;#39;s budget outlook worsened today with news that the revenue forecast is being downgraded by $118 million. Combined with a $96 million increase in caseloads, the state&amp;#39;s new budget deficit is projected to be $2.8 billion.&amp;nbsp; What are your suggestions for closing the budget gap?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121795" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/spending/default.aspx">spending</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/deficits/default.aspx">deficits</category></item><item><title>Bill would increase state sales tax by 1%</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/bill-would-increase-state-sales-tax-by-1.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121774</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121774</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/bill-would-increase-state-sales-tax-by-1.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The House has introduce HB 3183 entitled&amp;nbsp;the economic crisis revenue bill.&amp;nbsp; HB 3183 would increase the state&amp;#39;s sales tax by 1%.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121774" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx">elections</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/economics/default.aspx">economics</category></item><item><title>Senate to reconsider yesterday's vote on I-960</title><link>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/10/senate-to-reconsider-yesterday-s-vote-on-i-960.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8aea812f-02a0-4622-bb63-b8c2fd430f3a:121758</guid><dc:creator>Website Director</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=121758</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/10/senate-to-reconsider-yesterday-s-vote-on-i-960.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;SB 6843, which was&amp;nbsp;adopted only yesterday by the Senate, would have retained the transparency provisions of the Taxpayer Protection Act (I-960). However, those voting in favor of the bill didn&amp;#39;t know they were preserving the transparency provision requirements so the Senate plans to revote and remove these provisions today. Keep checking back for additional updates on suspension of I-960.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx">legislature</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx">elections</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/citizens/default.aspx">citizens</category><category domain="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/transparency/default.aspx">transparency</category></item></channel></rss>