<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title type="html">WashingtonVotes</title><subtitle type="html" /><id>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/atom.aspx</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/atom.aspx" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="4.0.30417.1769">Community Server</generator><updated>2010-02-10T01:43:00Z</updated><entry><title>First act of Special Session: Waive rules</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/16/first-act-of-special-session-waive-rules.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/16/first-act-of-special-session-waive-rules.aspx</id><published>2010-03-15T20:18:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-15T20:18:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The first action&amp;nbsp;of the&amp;nbsp;Special Session, which begins today in Olympia, was a vote by the Senate to&amp;nbsp;modify&amp;nbsp;transparency rules.&amp;nbsp; The rule change by the Senate&amp;nbsp;would allow for immediate floor action&amp;nbsp;on bills&amp;nbsp;after they pass a committee.&amp;nbsp; Here is a good blog&amp;nbsp;post describing today&amp;#39;s action: &lt;a href="http://washingtonpolicyblog.typepad.com/washington_policy_center_/2010/03/senate-adopts-rule-change-to-speed-up-session-.html" class="null"&gt;Senate adopts rule change to speed up votes&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121999" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="budget" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx" /><category term="special session" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx" /><category term="votes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/votes/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Special Session begins today</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/15/special-session-begins-today.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/15/special-session-begins-today.aspx</id><published>2010-03-15T06:30:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-15T06:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Special Session begins today in Olympia. There are very few details available, but lawmakers are expected to continue the work they started during the regular 60-day session. Their unfinished work includes negotiating the supplemental budget and finalizing a tax package. Check back later for more details as they become available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121998" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="special session" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes. budget" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes.+budget/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Its not over, Legislature headed for overtime!</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/12/its-not-over-legislature-headed-for-overtime.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/12/its-not-over-legislature-headed-for-overtime.aspx</id><published>2010-03-12T16:46:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-12T16:46:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Special Session will begin on Monday, March 15, 2010.&amp;nbsp; Legislators failed to finish their work in the provided 60-day session and will use the additional time to pass a budget and increase taxes.&amp;nbsp; What are your thoughts on this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121989" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="budget" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx" /><category term="special session" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Special Session becoming reality</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/10/special-session-becoming-reality.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/10/special-session-becoming-reality.aspx</id><published>2010-03-10T19:29:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-10T19:29:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The &lt;em&gt;Seattle Times&lt;/em&gt; is reporting this morning that&amp;nbsp;lawmakers in Olympia have determined that a special session&amp;nbsp;will be needed to finish the supplemental budget and tax packages.&amp;nbsp; Do you&amp;nbsp;think that lawmakers should have more time?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121968" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="budget" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx" /><category term="special session" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/special+session/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Senate to hear income tax bill in public hearing this afternoon.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/senate-to-hear-income-tax-bill-in-public-hearing-this-afternoon.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/senate-to-hear-income-tax-bill-in-public-hearing-this-afternoon.aspx</id><published>2010-03-04T20:58:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-04T20:58:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The state income tax bill scheduled for public hearing today at 4:30. SB 6250, which would create a graduated income tax, has been scheduled for a public hearing in the Senate Ways &amp;amp; Means Committee today at 4:30. It is our understanding the an amendment will be offered, but it is not yet available to the public. Stay tuned!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121920" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="citizens" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/citizens/default.aspx" /><category term="voters" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/voters/default.aspx" /><category term="income tax" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/income+tax/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Auto theft surcharge to cost $9.6 million per year</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/auto-theft-surcharge-to-cost-9-6-million-per-year.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/03/04/auto-theft-surcharge-to-cost-9-6-million-per-year.aspx</id><published>2010-03-04T16:30:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-04T16:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Senate Ways and Means Committee&amp;nbsp;passes SB 6871. Along with increasing court filing fees the proposal would also add a surcharge to car insurance policies to fight auto theft. According to the I-960 fiscal impact statement, the new charge is expected to collect $9.6 million annually from auto policyholders. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121917" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="fees" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/fees/default.aspx" /><category term="insurance" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/insurance/default.aspx" /><category term="theft" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/theft/default.aspx" /><category term="auto" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/auto/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Governor signs I-960 bill without vetoing advisory vote repeal </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/25/governor-signs-i-960-bill-without-vetoing-advisory-vote-repeal.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/25/governor-signs-i-960-bill-without-vetoing-advisory-vote-repeal.aspx</id><published>2010-02-25T00:51:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-25T00:51:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Governor Gregoire signed &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://washingtonpolicyblog.typepad.com/washington_policy_center_/2010/02/will-governor-veto-tax-transparency-suspension-.html"&gt;SB 6130 as adopted by the Legislature&lt;/a&gt;. There was some question as to whether the Governor would veto the 2-year repeal of the non-binding advisory votes. She said that she delayed the bill signing today to consider the requests to veto that section of the bill. As a result of today&amp;#39;s action the Washington Policy Center will be &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpolicy.org/pressroom/pressreleases/WPCPublishI960Pamphlet.html"&gt;publishing an I-960 voter&amp;#39;s pamphlet&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121879" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="government" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/government/default.aspx" /><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="budget" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx" /><category term="governor" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/governor/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Senate and House release budgets</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/24/senate-and-house-release-budgets.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/24/senate-and-house-release-budgets.aspx</id><published>2010-02-23T22:37:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-23T22:37:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Today, both the Senate and House of Representatives released their&amp;nbsp;2010 supplemental budget proposals.&amp;nbsp; Each budget relies on both tax cuts and reduced spending.&amp;nbsp; To see the details for each bill check out SB 6444 and HB 2824.&amp;nbsp; As more details regarding these budget proposals become available we will post them here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121877" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="budget" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>WashingtonVotes.org to provide information for I-960 voters' pamphlet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/19/washingtonvotes-org-to-provide-information-for-i-960-voters-pamphlet.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/19/washingtonvotes-org-to-provide-information-for-i-960-voters-pamphlet.aspx</id><published>2010-02-19T13:38:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-19T13:38:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;In the wake of SB 6130, which&amp;nbsp;would&amp;nbsp;repeal&amp;nbsp;voter protections in Initiative 960, Washington Policy Center today announced it will publish the public disclosure information that would have appeared in the voters&amp;rsquo; pamphlet if Initiative 960 had remained in place.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpolicy.org/pressroom/pressreleases/WPCPublishI960Pamphlet.html" class="null"&gt; Click here to read the full release from the Washignton Policy Center&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121859" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="elections" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx" /><category term="voters" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/voters/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>House debating SB 6130 on floor</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-debating-sb-6130-on-floor.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-debating-sb-6130-on-floor.aspx</id><published>2010-02-17T02:01:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-17T02:01:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The House of Representatives is&amp;nbsp;debating SB 6130 on the floor of the House.&amp;nbsp; SB 6130 would repeal voter protections of I-960 including eliminating&amp;nbsp;the 2/3 requiremnet to raise taxes and the requirement to provide&amp;nbsp;non-binding vote by the public when the legislature increases taxes.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121829" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="citizens" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/citizens/default.aspx" /><category term="initiative" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/initiative/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>House of Origin cutoff for both chambers</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-of-origin-cutoff-for-both-chambers.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/17/house-of-origin-cutoff-for-both-chambers.aspx</id><published>2010-02-16T21:56:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-16T21:56:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Both the Senate and the House are working towards today&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;House of Origin cutoff at 5:00 PM this afternoon.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Did the legislation that you are tracking pass?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121824" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Budget deficit grows to $2.8 billion</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/budget-deficit-grows-to-2-8-billion.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/budget-deficit-grows-to-2-8-billion.aspx</id><published>2010-02-12T19:52:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-12T19:52:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The state&amp;#39;s budget outlook worsened today with news that the revenue forecast is being downgraded by $118 million. Combined with a $96 million increase in caseloads, the state&amp;#39;s new budget deficit is projected to be $2.8 billion.&amp;nbsp; What are your suggestions for closing the budget gap?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121795" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="budget" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx" /><category term="spending" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/spending/default.aspx" /><category term="deficits" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/deficits/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Bill would increase state sales tax by 1%</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/bill-would-increase-state-sales-tax-by-1.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/12/bill-would-increase-state-sales-tax-by-1.aspx</id><published>2010-02-12T00:52:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-12T00:52:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The House has introduce HB 3183 entitled&amp;nbsp;the economic crisis revenue bill.&amp;nbsp; HB 3183 would increase the state&amp;#39;s sales tax by 1%.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121774" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="elections" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx" /><category term="economics" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/economics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Senate to reconsider yesterday's vote on I-960</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/10/senate-to-reconsider-yesterday-s-vote-on-i-960.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/10/senate-to-reconsider-yesterday-s-vote-on-i-960.aspx</id><published>2010-02-10T10:10:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-10T10:10:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;SB 6843, which was&amp;nbsp;adopted only yesterday by the Senate, would have retained the transparency provisions of the Taxpayer Protection Act (I-960). However, those voting in favor of the bill didn&amp;#39;t know they were preserving the transparency provision requirements so the Senate plans to revote and remove these provisions today. Keep checking back for additional updates on suspension of I-960.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="legislature" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/legislature/default.aspx" /><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="elections" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx" /><category term="citizens" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/citizens/default.aspx" /><category term="transparency" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/transparency/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>2/3 requirement passes Senate</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/10/2-3-requirement-passes-senate.aspx" /><id>/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/2010/02/10/2-3-requirement-passes-senate.aspx</id><published>2010-02-09T22:43:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-09T22:43:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Senate passes SB 6843.&amp;nbsp; The Senate&amp;nbsp;voted to &amp;quot;temporarily&amp;quot; suspend the 2/3 vote requirements for tax increases enacted multiple times by voters. The vote was 26 to 23.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The full Senate adopted an amendment that limited its changes to only the 2/3 vote restriction.&amp;nbsp; Next up for the proposal is debate in the House. See more at WAVotes.org&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=121750" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Website Director</name><uri>http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/members/Website-Director/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="taxes" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx" /><category term="elections" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx" /><category term="voters" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/voters/default.aspx" /><category term="Senate" scheme="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/forum/blogs/washingtonvotes/archive/tags/Senate/default.aspx" /></entry></feed>