Legislation watch
Capitol Building

2011 House Bill 1716: Regulating secondhand dealers who deal with precious metal property

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Comments

1) Re: 2011 House Bill 1716 (Regulating secondhand dealers who deal with precious metal property)  by crisscross on April 22, 2012 
The entire commerce chain from producer to client should establish some milder condition, with facilitating purposes for the entire market. I mean, most customers don`t know about the changes in regulations for dealers in every commercial field. They simply want to cover their needs as clients and go to, let`s say, yourlist.com, or any other giant online sales engine and look up for the desired products. Variations in prices come from the authorities who regulate commercial activities, not from producers or dealers most of the time. We only see these fluctuations without knowing their causes unless we dig more and look up for further insight.

Line

2) Re: 2011 House Bill 1716 (Regulating secondhand dealers who deal with precious metal property)  by M_DragonKnight on January 31, 2011 

 First, when was the last time you heard of a shopkeeper doing felony time for not displaying proper signage?  It is a standard warning.


This is a bill to fix a loophole of somesort that I'm sure was in dem's bill. 


Do we need it?  Probably not, but, here it is and all we can do is hope that it won't pass.


In the meantime the state goes deeper into debt.


 


 


 


Line

3) Re: 2011 House Bill 1716 (Regulating secondhand dealers who deal with precious metal property)  by Paul S. on January 31, 2011 

 Geesh-- While I understand the purpose, the rush to make anything and everything a @##$%$#@# Felony has just got to come tyo an end. A FELONY should be an act that makes the purpetrator unsuitable for social contact. NOT every little annoyance that comes along. You woonder why the jails are so full ? because every knee jerk representative wants to make some piss ant activity a felony. GET A GRIP. I would want this to be a civil offense, then money to support the state can be collected, instead of paying more to support the offending person.


Line

View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.