Washington Votes

2008 House Bill 2815 (greenhouse gas emissions and green collar jobs)

[Comments on this legislation] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

  • Introduced by Rep. Hans Dunshee, (D-Snohomish) on January 16, 2008, to implement a pilot program to limit greenhouse gasses by achieving set emission standards in this act. This act among other things, establishes the framework and policy requirements to reduce greenhouse gases along with reporting requirements (SB 6516).
    • Referred to the House Ecology & Parks Committee on January 16, 2008.
      • Substitute offered in the House on January 29, 2008, providing the ability to qualify for opportunity grants within high-demand green industries. It directs the DCTED to analyze the current opportunities for and participation in the clean energy economy by minority and women-owned business enterprises in Washington and it defers the GHG emissions reporting requirement for interstate marine, rail, and aircraft. This bill requires all reporting and related fees to be directly reported or paid to the DOE and directs the DOT to provide recommendations to reduce annual per capita vehicle miles traveled. It also requires the DOE to propose amendments to its rules to ensure administrative consistency with the federal rules and to ensure duplicate reporting is not required. This bill directs the DOE to provide strategies to adopt a lower-carbon fuel standard, and provide recommendations to increase the use of clean technology vehicles. It requires the DOE and the DOR to make recommendations on the potential design and implementation of more than one strategy to achieve the GHG reductions. This bill also requires the DOE to make recommendations on how local governments could be included in the multi-sector market based system. It also removes the design principles for the regional multi-sector market-based system, and makes technical corrections.
    • Referred to the House Appropriations Committee on January 31, 2008.
      • Substitute offered in the House on February 6, 2008, to add veterans or National Guard members to the list of target populations of workers that would be awarded grants from the green collar job training account. A null and void clause was added, making the bill null and void unless funded in the budget.
    • Referred to the House Rules Committee on February 11, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Mike Armstrong, (R-Wenatchee) on February 19, 2008, adding trucks to the vehicles with deferred greenhouse gas emission reporting requirements. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Maralyn Chase, (D-Shoreline) on February 19, 2008, Requiring DOE to consult with Washington State University, in addition to other organizations, in providing recommendations to the Legislature on forestry and agricultural lands and their participation in the multi-sector market-based system. Also requires the Employment Security Department to consult with Washington State University's small business center when conducting labor market research and requires the DCTED to make recommendations for financial incentives to expand small businesses. Finally, requires the Green Industry Skill Panel to plan strategies to meet recruitment and training needs of small businesses. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Dave Upthegrove, (D-Des Moines) on February 19, 2008, Requires the department of ecology to develop a plan to limit emissions of greenhouse gases to achieve emission reductions, develop and implement a system for monitoring and reporting emissions of greenhouse gases, to track progress toward meeting the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases, including results from previously and future policies, and report on that progress. Also, requires the Ecology and Community, Trade and Economic Development to report by December 31st of each even-numbered year to the governor and the appropriate committees of the legislature total emissions of greenhouse gases for the proceeding two years, and totals in each major source sector. Emissions from agriculture and forestry practices and their directly associated operations are not considered greenhouse gases. Specifies that emissions of carbon dioxide from industrial combustion of biomass in the form of fuel wood, wood waste, wood byproducts, and wood residuals are not considered a greenhouse gas as long as the region's silvicultural sequestration capacity is maintained or increased. Removes references to a direct price signal design. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Dave Upthegrove, (D-Des Moines) on February 19, 2008, to add additional clarifying language and technical changes. This striker amendment, among other things, changes dates, tracking, and reporting requirements. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Glenn Anderson, (R-Fall City) on February 19, 2008, to require the revenues created by the market system be used to retrain workers that have been displaced by the effects of the market system's implementation. The amendment failed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Glenn Anderson, (R-Fall City) on February 19, 2008, requiring the DOE to make recommendations on how to expand the electrical transmission infrastructure into urban and rural areas for the purposes of allowing the recharging of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Glenn Anderson, (R-Fall City) on February 19, 2008, requiring the DOE to convene a task force to provide recommendations on how to improve the effectiveness of the GMA's goals while achieving the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The amendment failed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Glenn Anderson, (R-Fall City) on February 19, 2008, providing a business and occupation tax credit for businesses subject to the annual reporting requirements. The amendment failed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Doug Ericksen, (R-Ferndale) on February 19, 2008, to remove the provisions of the bill that require the Department of Ecology to limit the emissions of greenhouse gases based on set goals, but retains provisions that expressly exempt the burning of certain wood biomass from being considered a greenhouse gas. The amendment failed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
      • Amendment offered by Rep. Norma Smith, (R-Whidbey Island) on February 19, 2008, to require the DOT to provide a report on the anticipated impacts of the Vehicle Miles Traveled goals. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on February 19, 2008.
  • Passed in the House (64 to 31) on February 19, 2008. [Vote Details and Comments]
  • Received in the Senate on February 21, 2008.
    • Referred to the Senate Water, Energy, and Environment Committee on February 21, 2008.
    • Referred to the Senate Ways & Means Committee on February 28, 2008.
    • Referred to the Senate Rules Committee on March 3, 2008.
  • Passed in the Senate (29 to 19) on March 5, 2008. [Vote Details and Comments]
  • Signed by Gov. Christine Gregoire on March 13, 2008.

Line

Comments

Introduced by Rep. Hans Dunshee, (D-Snohomish) on January 16, 2008. Passed in the House (64 to 31) on February 19, 2008. New Comment

1) I'm Skeptical about Climate Change Skeptics [by Anonymous Citizen on April 3, 2008]
You have to be some sort of complete failure at science to still refute manmade climate change today. I'm guessing these are the people who never paid attention in 4th grade science class to the basic fact that the 27 billion tons of CO2 put into the air each year traps heat. 95% of climatologists agree with it, and unless you're a climatologist, stop arguing against it with inane conspiracy theories.

We need to act soon on greenhouse emissions, while it's economically feasible, because trying to deal with the impacts on unabated climate change 50 years from now will be huge otherwise. And as for those who would cry wolf about the economic costs, consider this: a lot of our fossil fuel usage hinders the economy; fuel efficiency, ethanol, and road tolling can boost the economy. On the other hand, dealing with the impacts 50 years from now, if we don't do anything, could cost around 30% of GDP. This is from an MIT study. So don't refute this stuff unless you know what you're talking about.
Reply New Comment

Line

2) Charge By the Mile [by Anonymous Citizen on March 22, 2008]
I want to know how they are going to charge by the mile? Will that be a tax, and will it be imposed on tourist? Toll booths at every corner?

I believe that if we all STOP BREATHING today, we could cut ALL of our carbon emissions instantaneously. Problem cured.

Somebody, get real. This proposed legislations on "green technology" and cutting emissions is not doing a damn thing, in fact I belive a lot of the technology, and laws are creating more pollution, and issues than it solves.

People don't see "global warming" as an issue, because its not an issue. We see it as "Chicken Little" or as a little "Boy who cried Wolf", and as the normal Earth cycle that it is. Man's impact is exaggerated and without definitive scientific data. Every one points to the "ICE" but ice study s are new, and other factors could affect that research more than we currently understand and I believe it will require more research before it can ever be accepted as definitive EARTH temperature measurements over eons of time. Beyond that man's ability to manipulate the Earth's climate is outside of his reach and technological ability at this time to control, even regionally.

We are skeptical, and want more scientific evidence before we commit to a course of action that may bring more harm than good, or is economically unsound, and without real scientific study. Science first, then solutions based on scientific research that make an actual change. Not lets experiment and see if it fixes the perceived problem. I believe in sound management of all our resources, and protecting the environment. But right now this is one issues that a lot of people we are all going off on half cocked!

Derick
Bonham, TX
Reply New Comment

Line

3) Thank You Olympia [by Anonymous Citizen on March 21, 2008]
If 99 percent of aeronautical engineers said the plane you were about to get on was going to crash, would you still get on it? 99 percent of all climate scientists say that global warming is very real and is mostly due to man-made causes, so why don't folks want to believe it? This is not a left or right wing issue. My thanks to anyone involved in making this legislation happen.
Reply New Comment

Line

4) Eco-Terrorists in Govt [by Anonymous Citizen on March 22, 2008]
The eco-terrorists are running the government. Studies have shown that if EVERYONE stopped driving their car, CO2 emissions would drop by less than 1%.
Ther is no man made global warming. "99% of climate scientists agree" is false and a LIE.
Reply New Comment

Line

5) legislature runs amok [by Anonymous Citizen on March 12, 2008]
Legislative stupidity has been on the rise since 1992 just like emissions from the tens of thousands of cars that have moved into this state since then. If the gas bags who are trying to make the ridiculous claims that global warming and ice age cooling have something to do with humans would bottle that gas we could pretty much end harmful emissions. This bill is the latest example of the inmates being in charge of the asylum. I don't think any comments made here will have any chance of stopping our female on steroids governor from signing this bomb, but what the hell.
Reply New Comment

Line

6) Green is great! [by Anonymous Citizen on March 8, 2008]
Wow!!!!! This is fantastic!!!!!! Yeah!!!!!!
To bad this bill isn't more strict against those evil earth-haters and their big Hummers.
Reply New Comment

Line

7) JAX [by Anonymous Citizen on February 25, 2008]
Arrogance runs rampant in Olympia. These political prostitutes think they own the state and will do everything in the power they think they have to screw it up for the citizens and for business. Vote every one of them out of office and get someone, anyone in there with some brains for a change. They must have sawdust for brains.
Reply New Comment

Line

8) Global warming hoax [by Anonymous Citizen on February 22, 2008]
The idiots voting for this bill will eventually bankrupt the State and ruin the economy in the belief they are saving the Planet, or maybe they just want to exercise their power. They need to be stopped!
Reply New Comment

Line

9) BLUE-GREEN BILLS $$$ [by SIDNY on February 20, 2008]
This State is rapidly turning from blue to green. Legislators are tripping over each other to see who can submit the dumbest amendment. Hang on to your wallets!
Reply New Comment

Line

10) This is a joke, right? [by Anonymous Citizen on February 14, 2008]
Let me get this straight:
1. Create a huge new government bureaucracy;
2. Roll back emissions to HALF of what they were EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO; and
3. Create 25,000 "green" jobs to make up for the five million real ones that will leave the state.

Obviously the comedy writers have been keeping busy while they were out on strike. This would be hysterically funny if it weren't for the fact that your legislature is likely to pass it. Washington voters are getting what they deserve for sending this bunch of clowns to Olympia. They are truly drunk with power and money.
Reply New Comment

Line

11) Science is out [by Anonymous Citizen on January 21, 2008]
Science is out. Power is in. This bill is sponsored by the person that led the charge of the bio-fuel brigade and ignored all science brought to his attention. The only thing that will do is raise the price of your groceries and fuel. It is time that we talk rational about ecology and stop sacrificing our future prosperity on the altar of flim flam.
Reply New Comment

Line

12) Science is out [by Anonymous Citizen on January 21, 2008]
Science is out. Power is in. This bill is sponsored by the person that led the charge of the bio-fuel brigade and ignored all science brought to his attention. The only thing that will do is raise the price of your groceries and fuel. It is time that we talk rational about ecology and stop sacrificing our future prosperity on the altar of flim flam.
Reply New Comment

Line



Capitol Building

Search legislation: