Washington Votes

2007 Senate Bill 5484 (Allowing dogs in bars.)

[Comments on this legislation] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

  • Introduced by Sen. Ken Jacobsen, (D-Seattle) on January 22, 2007, to allow a holder of a liquor license to allow patrons to bring dogs onto the premises during business hours. The bill requires the dog to be well behaved and leashed.
    • Referred to the Senate Labor, Commerce, Research and Development Committee on January 22, 2007.
      • Substitute offered to the Senate Labor, Commerce, Research and Development Committee on February 28, 2007, to require the state Department of Health to establish a three year pilot project (until June 30, 2010) by which local health departments can apply for an exemption from the FDA food code to allow dogs in certain designated outdoor portions of premises holding certain liquor licenses; or premises whose main purpose is selling coffee. Local governments who participate can establish by ordinance a local exemption from the food code to allow dogs in certain portions of designated businesses. To participate, the local exemption procedure must require that the businesses obtain a permit from the local public health department. Certain information must be provided to the health department to obtain the permit. The local ordinance must include the requirements protecting health and safety that are listed in the bill.
    • Referred to the Senate Rules Committee on February 28, 2007.

Line

Comments

Introduced by Sen. Ken Jacobsen, (D-Seattle) on January 22, 2007. New Comment

1) Awesome law! [by Anonymous Citizen on February 20, 2008]
I'm all for it. Having lived where people aren't so prissy about such things, I've seen firsthand that it's no big deal. Of course leave it up to the individual restaurant owner, but it would be an especially nice option for outdoor dining areas.
Reply New Comment

Line

2) Stupid Law [by Anonymous Citizen on March 3, 2007]
Clouseau: Does your dog bite?

Hotel Clerk: No.

Clouseau: [bowing down to pet the dog] Nice doggie. [Dog barks and bites Clouseau in the hand]

Clouseau: I thought you said your dog did not bite!

Hotel Clerk: That is not my dog.
Reply New Comment

Line

3) under worked and over paid!!! [by Anonymous Citizen on February 1, 2007]
I have never heard of something so stupid in my life. and how is going to be liable if "fido" decides he does not like someone or another dog and a fight breaks out and a patron is hurt? I surely hope not the bar owner. No dog should be allowed in any place of business unless its a seeing eye or K-9 dog. Fido never bites, tell that to the last person that was harmed by a dog.

I hate to say it, but the truth is, there are far more important problems in WAshington state and for once I would like to see both the House and SEnate earn their wages and use some common sense if that is not too much to ask for on the taxpayers backs.
Reply New Comment

Line

4) Dogs but no smokers? [by Anonymous Citizen on January 31, 2007]
So now we treat our pets better than people? We allow a dog to come in out of the cold but not a smoker? Incredible.
Reply New Comment

Line

5) You're kidding right? [by Anonymous Citizen on January 30, 2007]
NO,,..NO,...NO,...Dogs should have to smoke outside in cold, damp, wet, hot, weather too.
Will there be separate K-9 section?,...wouldn't want them to "migrate" to the non-K-9 side of the same room.
Reply New Comment

Line

6) Dee [by Anonymous Citizen on January 29, 2007]
I think it is up to the owner of the business what they allow in. weather it be dogs or smokers.
Reply New Comment

Line

7) reality check [by Anonymous Citizen on January 23, 2007]
I suppose the first question is: Do the dogs have to be three years of age, the equiivalent of 21, and be able to prove it.
Reply New Comment

Line

8) Yeah! [by Anonymous Citizen on January 23, 2007]
And just remember...no smoking dogs allowed!
Reply New Comment

Line

9) Get Real [by Anonymous Citizen on January 29, 2007]
There aren't that many people allergic to dogs, let the dogs go to bars.

If people are allergic or if they have a phobia to dogs they can just go to non-bowser bars.

It's just like with smoking, if people don't like smoke from a cigarette they can go to non-smok......

Oh, that's right.....Nevermind.
Reply New Comment

Line

10) OLd Voter [by Anonymous Citizen on January 23, 2007]
Yahoo!!! its about time our dogs get some recognition. I don't go in bars, but I resent having to let my dog stay in the car while I go into hardware stores etc. My dog is better behaved than most kids I see running and screaming in the stores. She stays on leash and at my side at all times. Dogs are close companions to many people as mine is to me. Give the dogs a break.
Reply New Comment

Line



Capitol Building

Search legislation: